نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
This document gives template for authors to prepare manuscripts for submission in the journal of The topic of balance of evidence is one of the common rules of the principles of jurisprudence and the science of Qur'anic interpretation, but the usulists have often discussed the above topic under the title of "balance and preference" in jurisprudence, that too only in the realm of hadiths and under the title of "remedial news". The greatest need for the interpretation of the Qur'an to the above rules is in the field of non-judgmental verses and in the realm of various forms of conflict between sources and interpretive evidence, which has been neglected mainly from the perspective of the researches of the Us lists and Shia commentators, that too in a centralized and comprehensive manner. The present article, which is written in a descriptive, analytical and fundamental way, observes the most basic and practical types of established and non-established conflict between interpretive evidence and conflict in single words in the form of the following three types: 1- Types of non-established conflict Located between two or more interpretative reasons that lead to "customary plural" and, in turn, 30 types: conflict between general and specific; absolute and binding; the ruler and the condemned; general and absolute; appearance and manifestation;2- Types of conflicts established between two or more reasons for interpretation, which include the following 35 types: conflict between the Qur'an and the Qur'an; Narratives with each other; two rational reasons with each other; two consensus with each other; Quran with narration
کلیدواژهها English
33.نوید، نفیسه، تعارض سیاق و اسباب النزول، پژوهش دینی، شماره 16، 1387
